DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
7O1 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 °
CRS
Docket No: 3584-13
7 May 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered’ your
application on 26 February 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
He quiaksons and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof,- your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of Probable material
error or: injustice. co : m ye .
The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from
12 “July 1994 to 11 February 2002; when you were discharged by
reason of ‘the'good of the service-to ‘escape: trial by court-
martial for an unauthorized absence of 580 days, with a
discharge under other than honorable conditions. You were
assigned a reentry ‘code of RE- 4 ‘as required by governing
directives. . 88 - # ae
Clearly your preseiit reentry code is administratively correct
and in view of the'seriousness of your offense for which you
were discharged you have not demonstrated that it would be in
the interest of justice for the Board to assign’ a more favorable
code as an exception to policy. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board did not consider whether your characterization: of
service or reason for separation should be changed, since you
have not exhausted an available administrative remedy by
applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). You may do
so by submitting the attached DD Form 293 to the NDRB.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
TTS Sine
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4349-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5384-13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. — A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval’ — Records, sitting in executive session, considered your : application on 12. “Consequently, swhen applying for a correction of an official “naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3446-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official - naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4089 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, /considered your application on 29 February 2014. vous? : : > ro The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3088 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As your present reentry code is correct, and you have not demonstrated that it would be in-the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code as'-an exception to policy, there is no basis for granting your request. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4845 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3615 13
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5S. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official- naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3315-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval — Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ,Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR9464-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. The Board also considered the report of the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 26 February - 2009, a copy of which is attached. The Board, in its review of your entire record, carefully considered all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, post service good conduct, current desire to remove your ~ NUP, and upgrade your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6212 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...